GEO • AI search visibility
Peec AI API alternative
If you searched for a Peec AI API alternative, you may already have a reporting stack. The problem is getting evidence into it without buying a full monitoring platform first. Peec’s API exposes its platform data to Enterprise customers. UnifAPI lets you purchase public-data calls directly. Before replacing an integration, separate three jobs: collecting answers, calculating metrics, and delivering client reports.
Choose the right fit
Choose Peec AI
Teams that want recurring prompt tracking, competitor views, and ready-made reporting.
Choose UnifAPI
You want live ChatGPT/Gemini evidence, repeatable prompt panels, or API data for your own GEO product. Use the included local monitoring runner or your own application; you control scheduling, storage, analysis, and presentation.
What replacing Peec’s API would actually replace
API access and data collection are separate product decisions.
How Peec AI handles it
Peec’s API introduction describes organization-scoped access to data already available in its platform. It is Enterprise-only and currently labeled beta. Buying that API means accessing Peec’s project data; it does not mean renting an unrelated, general-purpose answer collection endpoint.
Peec AI · Official sources ↗How UnifAPI handles it
With UnifAPI, authenticate with your own UnifAPI key and send domains, keywords, or queries directly. Map each old report field to its source: answer text, citation URL, prompt label, calculated score, or project metadata. Only the supported public-data inputs have an API counterpart; preserve project labels and historical reports in your application.
What this means for your team
This is a workflow migration, not a base-URL change. Confirm export entitlements before closing an existing Peec account.
A practical pipeline for a monthly agency report
Start with a report that can be verified end to end before expanding the query list.
How Peec AI handles it
If you retain Peec, its tracked projects remain the source of historical observations. Retrieve the permitted data through its API or exports and keep Peec’s metric definitions attached to the series.
Peec AI · Official sources ↗How UnifAPI handles it
Begin with 20 prompts and collect one ChatGPT and one Gemini sample per prompt: 40 successful answers cost $1.20 at the current rate. Set a run budget and save the snapshot before summarizing. Repeat with the same panel for the next report. The runner resumes pending work and avoids automatic replay of unknown outcomes. Add /geo/mentions/history for a separate monthly corpus view; it cannot backfill your earlier custom prompts.
What this means for your team
Validate one client report against its linked answers first. Then add scheduling, retry limits, client isolation, and a cost cap for each collection run.
Visibility scores: what is actually being divided?
A percentage is only comparable when the underlying sample stays comparable.
How Peec AI handles it
Peec defines visibility as the proportion of responses mentioning a brand. Its dashboard also distinguishes position and sentiment. A brand could appear frequently but late in answers, or appear with negative language; those are different problems for a marketer.
Peec AI · Official sources ↗How UnifAPI handles it
UnifAPI returns evidence and aggregate mention breakdowns you can use in your own analysis. Decide whether you count brand names, cited domains, or both. In an illustrative sample of 100 answers, 28 brand mentions and 11 linked citations mean a 28% mention rate and an 11% citation rate, not one interchangeable “visibility” score.
What this means for your team
Do not compare a Peec percentage with the number of rows returned by a domain-filtered API query. The latter excludes the answers where the domain was absent.
From a citation list to a content or PR decision
Finding a cited domain is the beginning of research, not the recommendation itself.
How Peec AI handles it
Peec’s source analysis provides domain and URL views for investigating the material referenced in tracked answers. Its documentation distinguishes a source accessed during answer generation from a citation explicitly referenced in the answer.
Peec AI · Official sources ↗How UnifAPI handles it
Use /geo/mentions/top-domains to identify recurring publishers, then /geo/mentions/top-pages to narrow the research to specific pages. Inspect the answer and source URL before deciding whether the next step is a documentation update, a comparison article, or outreach. Your assistant can turn this evidence into a brief while you retain links for review.
What this means for your team
A frequently cited site is a research lead, not proof that buying a placement there will improve rankings. Separate observed evidence from your proposed action.
From collection to a reviewable report
- 01
Collect answers
- 02
Save dated evidence
- 03
Analyze the sample
- 04
Deliver the report
The included Node runner checks live prices and a run budget, saves answer evidence to local JSON/CSV, resumes pending cells, and compares paired successful samples. Reuse saved data for reports. Your scheduler starts future runs; a crashed or timed-out request stays unknown until reviewed.
Monitoring runner and setup guide ↗Available API building blocks
| Operation | Minimum / call | Credits / record |
|---|---|---|
Live ChatGPT / Gemini answersPOST /geo/answers | $0.03 | 30 |
AI Mode answers & citationsPOST /geo/serp | $0.01 | 1 |
Brand and domain mentionsPOST /geo/mentions/search | $1.00 | 10 |
Competitor mention comparisonPOST /geo/mentions/cross-aggregated-metrics | $0.50 | 1 |
Frequently cited domainsPOST /geo/mentions/top-domains | $0.50 | 1 |
AI keyword search volumePOST /geo/keywords/search-volume | $0.05 | 1 |
Monthly indexed mention historyPOST /geo/mentions/history | $0.50 | 1 |
Indexed mention changesPOST /geo/mentions/delta | $1.00 | 10 |
New / lost indexed mentionsPOST /geo/mentions/new-lost | $1.00 | 10 |
Which engines and regions can you query?
Live custom prompts use Google AI Mode via /geo/serp, or ChatGPT and Gemini web answers via /geo/answers. Indexed mention search and aggregation remain separate: engine=google covers Google AI Overviews; engine=chatgpt covers ChatGPT in the United States, in English. Perplexity and Claude live prompts are not supported. UI translations do not expand data coverage.
Available API building blocks →Pay as you go, with visible call minimums
Credits cost $0.001 each, paid from a prepaid top-up. Charges follow the operation’s per-record rate and minimum; returning fewer records does not remove that minimum. Your assistant subscription, storage, and scheduling costs are separate.
| Workload | ChatGPT / Gemini calls | AI Mode calls | Mention-search calls | Minimum API usage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-off audit | 40 | 20 | 2 | $3.40 |
| Monthly research report | 400 | 100 | 10 | $23.00 |
| Daily collection · 30 days | 6,000 | 3,000 | 30 | $240.00 |
Illustrative workloads, not equivalent competitor plans. The daily example uses 100 prompts on each of ChatGPT and Gemini, 100 AI Mode calls and one indexed search per day for 30 days. Larger result sets and additional collection cost more. Set a maximum budget before running; unknown outcomes are not automatically retried.
Peec AI: Its brand pricing page lists API access under Enterprise with custom pricing.
Peec AI · Official sources ↗Estimate the workflow before you commit
Budget every operation separately. The monthly example includes 400 ChatGPT/Gemini answers, 100 AI Mode calls and 10 mention searches: at least $23.00 in API usage. The 400 answers can represent 100 prompts × two engines × two samples. This assumes the other calls stay within their billing minimums and excludes history or other extra operations. A prepaid top-up is separate from consumed credits.
See pricingMake your first AI visibility request
curl --max-time 150 --request POST 'https://api.unifapi.com/api/geo/answers' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_UNIFAPI_KEY' \
--header 'X-Unifapi-Max-Credits: 30' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{
"prompt": "Which project management software works well for a small team?",
"engine": "chatgpt",
"location": "us",
"language": "en",
"brands": [
{
"id": "your-brand",
"names": [
"Example Brand"
],
"domains": [
"example.com"
]
}
]
}'
curl --max-time 150 --request POST 'https://api.unifapi.com/api/geo/mentions/search' \
--header 'Authorization: Bearer YOUR_UNIFAPI_KEY' \
--header 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{
"target": [
{
"domain": "example.com"
}
],
"engine": "google",
"language": "en",
"limit": 20,
"view": "standard"
}'Illustrative requests, not measured results. Replace the prompt, aliases and domains. Live answers can take up to 120 seconds; the example waits 150 seconds and caps that request at 30 credits. Inspect credits_charged. A valid no-answer response is charged; collection errors are not. Do not automatically replay a timeout with an unknown outcome.
Connect via MCPMove the workflow, keep the evidence
| Existing input or output | UnifAPI counterpart | Keep in your application |
|---|---|---|
| Answer and citation evidence | Collect a new sample; retain query settings and timestamps. | |
| Project and prompt labels | — | Store client IDs, prompt labels, scheduling, and access rules. |
| Historical visibility reports | Keep exported prompt history and its definitions. Monthly corpus history is a separate dataset; start a new fixed-panel baseline. |
Start with a small set of queries and domains. Match language, location, engine, date, and sampling method before comparing results. Update authentication, request bodies, and response handling: this is not a drop-in implementation of Peec AI’s API and does not export its private project history.
Compare measurements, not just scores
Mention coverage divides successful samples mentioning a brand by all successful samples. Tracked-brand mention share instead divides that brand’s mention samples by the sum of mention samples for every tracked brand. Brands can overlap, so these denominators differ. Count citations separately. Valid no-answer samples remain in coverage; failed or unknown collections do not. For a trend, compare paired successful cells from the same panel and settings. Neither metric measures visits or conversions.
What to check in a trial or demo
For an agency, test whether you need a shared client workspace with daily prompt history or only evidence at report time. Ask Peec which API objects your plan exposes, whether historical answers are exportable, and which models and countries are included. With UnifAPI, define your own client IDs and retain dated answer snapshots.
Plan for the differences
The included runner can repeat your own prompt panel, but UnifAPI does not host its schedule or a project dashboard. Monthly indexed history is available; it is not a replay of your earlier custom prompts. First-party bot logs, sentiment or recommendation-rank scoring, Perplexity/Claude live prompts, and automatic website changes are not included.
Peec’s tracked-prompt history and visibility scores will not transfer automatically. Re-establish your baseline using the same queries, sampling window, and data source.
Which one should you choose?
Choose Peec when your team wants a managed workspace with tracked-prompt history and shared reporting. Choose UnifAPI for focused audits or repeated ChatGPT/Gemini monitoring inside a product, warehouse or assistant workflow you control. Include the cost of operating the local runner, scheduling and reporting when comparing pay-as-you-go data with a subscription.
Questions before you switch
Is UnifAPI always cheaper?
No universal saving is promised. Compare your expected calls and billable records with the subscription or quote you would otherwise buy, including the work needed to build reporting.
Can it replace the entire Peec AI platform?
It can supply public-data building blocks for your own research workflow. Managed dashboards, proprietary metrics, model coverage, and enterprise services differ; choose the full platform if those are your main requirements.
Can I monitor the same prompts over time?
Yes. The included runner samples ChatGPT and Gemini, saves dated local evidence, and compares the same successful cells across runs. Configure your own scheduler for recurring collection. Keep this prompt-panel history separate from the monthly indexed corpus returned by the history, delta and new/lost APIs.
How this comparison was prepared
Prepared by UnifAPI from the linked official product and pricing pages and our published API contract. We did not test paid competitor accounts or benchmark data accuracy. Product facts, our fit assessment, and illustrative cost calculations serve different purposes; the example request is not a live result.
Official sources
- https://peec.ai/pricing
- https://docs.peec.ai/api/introduction
- https://docs.peec.ai/metrics/brand-metrics/visibility
- https://docs.peec.ai/understanding-sources
Reviewed 2026-09-05. Plans and API terms can change; confirm current access with the vendor. This is an independent comparison, with no affiliation or endorsement.
GEO API alternatives
Best GEO tools by use case: compare four platforms
Peec AI
Peec AI organizes AI search visibility into a managed workspace for marketing teams.
Profound
Profound combines answer-engine insights, Agent Analytics, and content workflows.
Botify
Botify spans website analytics, AI visibility, and search optimization automation.